|
Post by Kiwi Frontline on Oct 27, 2016 5:23:09 GMT 12
The New Zealand Herald 27/10/16
WRITTEN CONSTITUTION A written constitution would significantly alter the balance of power from Parliament in favour of judges. With no disrespect to the local judiciary, they are not elected and such policy issues are not suited for judicial determination.
If a 75 per cent majority to change the constitution cannot be obtained, the result is dependent upon judicial decisions interpreting and adjudicating conflicting rights in the constitution. Look at the United States, where the breaking of current deadlocks depends upon the political leanings of the judge yet to be appointed.
The reason New Zealand’s democracy is one of the best in the world (if not the best) does not depend upon whether or not the constitution is in writing, but on the willingness of politicians to listen to the people, the willingness of people to participate in the political process, the work behind decisions and the reasonableness of decision making under the watchful eye of the populace.
Because of the complicated background in which constitutional issues can arise, resolution is usually best dealt with contemporaneously and in context. J C, St Mary’s Bay.
|
|