Post by Kiwi Frontline on Mar 10, 2020 12:23:10 GMT 12
www.facebook.com/TeAoWithMoana/videos/2641348936094430/
RACE GRIFTING NASTY ‘AMBUSH’ INTERVIEW - Maniapoto, Tukaki, Costello
Video above analyzed by AR & SW
Just because you’re a minority doesn’t mean you’re oppressed Let’s take a look at some points in this race grifting nasty ‘ambush’ interview An overview note that Maniapoto and Tukaki are scrambling to personalise the debate and define Casey Costello’s identity by slinging dirty, dirty smears
Firstly, we take our hats off to Casey Costello for entering the vipers’ den and participating on a 2 vs. 1 tilted playing field where her opponents hold the cards and dominate the airwaves, constantly interrupting and badgering her with smears and sneers — a very courageous lady.
———————————-
TUKAKI says >
“our people have been suffering for many years” unquote
“our people”? > That’s neo-apartheid racism right there…
as for “suffering” see reply #2 below
TUKAKI says >
“our people have suffered institutional racism from the time we were settled by Europeans” unquote
—Institutional racism—
The basis of ‘evidence’ for the claim of ‘institutional racism’ appears to be a body of work undertaken by the Human Rights Commission in 2010.
They interviewed 35 people, yes, a sample of 35! Were they randomly selected?. They interviewed 35 people to conclude that racism is rampant within New Zealand’s public service institutions. What a confirmation bias skewed rort! That sort of ‘study’ is indistinguishable from a drummed up narrative fraud.
For such a report to have been offered as serious research is an indictment on the Human Rights Commission’s role of propping up anti-British civilisation of New Zealand false narratives and breathing oxygen into race grifting confirmation bias in favour of the narrative fraud the British Empire’s colonisation of New Zealand was a ‘mistake’ that needs to be ‘corrected’ by the NZHRC race hustling white shaming and ‘post colonial white guilt’. This is another example of why this one-eyed agency holds a knife to the heart of race relations in New Zealand, drums-up narratives of white racism where there isn’t any, and should be abolished forthwith.
Needless to say that bogus ‘research’ was seized upon by the identity political Maori Party narcissists, who are desperately looking for any confected justification and opportunity to insert Treaty clauses directly into legislation…
Continue reading here > www.nzcpr.com/institutional-racism/
Further, see Elliot Ikilei’s video on Māori imprisonment and institutional racism here >
sites.google.com/…/kiwifrontl…/enlightenments/racism
TUKAKI says >
“people are being excluded as opposed to being included “ unquote
It is activist Maori identitarians, Treaty Troughers such as Tukaki that reject being a New Zealander, reject being a Kiwi, label themselves ‘Maori’ of this or that Iwi, and therefore exclude themselves. They self-victimise, self-ostracise for the benefits, such as funding and racial special privileges etc. In the longer term though, this identity political strategy is to gain power and wealth by pretending that 92 percent of Maori chiefs in 1840 did not cede sovereignty of New Zealand to the Queen in a protection-for-British-citizenship deal. This strategy is an a-historical effort to claw Maori sovereignty back by breaking the terms of the Treaty. This begins with the lie that The Treaty is a fraud.
TUKAKI says >
“teaching our kids in the classroom about our shared history” unquote
‘Shared history’? — again Trougher Tukaki sees Maori / non-Maori — it is one history, New Zealand history.
TUKAKI says >
“at the moment we get a one-sided view of history” unquote
Correct—the one-sided myth & bad history faux Maori view of New Zealand’s civilisation by the British is being taught right now in our education system.
TUKAKI says >
“if we had of started this process decades and decades ago we wouldn’t be we are today” unquote
We are where we are today because—see > sites.google.com/…/enlightenme…/how-it-all-started-1
MANIAPOTO says >
“51% of maori make up the prison incarceration rate and 380% are more likely to be convicted of a crime… surely those statistics point to some form of institutional racism” unquote
In the main, people in prison or convicted of a crime—have committed a crime, of which there is a victim or victims, regardless of race. The victims of young Maori male violent crime tend to be Maori.
MANIAPOTO says >
“if you look around the world at indigenous Australians, native Canadians and Americans, those people are represented negatively in all statistics similar to maori, so can you see a link between colonisation, ongoing disempowerment and those negative statistics” unquote
There is no valid similar comparison — At that time (1800s) a strong humanitarian movement centred on the churches influenced British colonial policy and this meant the Colonial Secretary Lord Normanby genuinely tried to treat New Zealand inhabitants (Maori) better than happened in earlier colonisations — which led to a race unifying treaty in which Maori were granted the rights of British citizens (arguably the British Empire was the greatest power on earth at that time, there is no doubt they could have crushed Maori militarily if they had wanted to. The British won Anglo-Zulu War that was fought in 1879 between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom, a more formidable enemy).
Being granted British citizenship, and protection in exchange for 92% of chiefs ceding sovereignty was a huge boon to Maori, especially the thousands of slaves to the Maori ruling tribal elite.
TUKAKI says >
“the institutions have not been set up in Maori’s favour” unquote
Since 1840 many statutes have been passed with good intention to help Maori adapt to changing times. But today’s crop of identity political, anti colonial, neo tribal agenda driven grievance mongering Maori and their white Left sycophants twist these to put them in bad light.
TUKAKI says >
“somebody comes to our country and what they then do is implementing their own way of doing things” unquote
In an era of exploration, Maori and New Zealand could not stay isolated, it was inevitable they would be discovered, first by the Dutch, then by the English and French.
After Maori chiefs begged for protection (letter to King William IV 1831) mainly from the French, the British offered them a treaty which the large majority signed. This treaty involved the British way of doing things like—legal title to land, British Common Law etc. It was clear to those wise chiefs that the maori way of doing things was not sufficient any longer.
TUKAKI says >
“we were fine before anybody else got here” unquote
I wonder would Tukaki and his racist malcontent ilk would like to go back and live in pre-European times of tribal pillage and plunder (warfare), feast and famine, in places and at times bitterly cold conditions with unsuitable housing and clothes etc. Tukaki’s portly frame looks like he is doing OK in the current era 🙂
TUKAKI says >
“bringing to bear the percentage of blood we have flowing through our veins” unquote
In 1953 Maori voted to affirm the setting the blood quantum for enrolment on the Maori electoral roll to be set at 50 percent Maori or more, in the mid-seventies when, as a result of the rapid rate of intermarriage in this country, the number of legally defined ‘Maori’ with 50 percent or more of Maori blood, was in serious decline.
This led to demands for a change in the legal definition and, as a result, the 1974 Maori Affairs Amendment Act replaced the blood quantum classification with one based on self-identification and ethnic affiliation—in other words, having a Maori descendent. (Alan Richards adds – or ‘I feel Maori’)
This arbitrary political manoeuvre, is just that, an arbitrary definition based on a consensus of opinion which guaranteed an on-going rise in the number of people categorised as ‘Maori’, thereby fulfilling the tribal leaders’ ambitions for consolidating and increasing power and resources.
Over the years, the Maori rights movement has also successfully persuaded successive governments to allocate increasing levels of funding to race-based initiatives – all in the name of reducing so-called ‘Maori’ disadvantage, rather than reducing disadvantage based on need. The problem is that such programmes are based on a false premise—it is not being Maori that causes disadvantage, instead, it is such culturally influenced things as a lack of education, long term welfare dependency, sole parenthood, relational, family and community cultures of violence and criminality, substance abuse, or living in an area where there are no jobs.
Many New Zealanders are becoming increasingly alarmed about the long-term impact of the government’s continued dangerously divisive promotion of ‘race’ within our society. It is being used by corporate iwi as a ruse to progress their increasingly radical demands... > www.nzcpr.com/reflecting-on-our-past-and-future/
TUKAKI says >
“we have right wing groups that have been working and operating for many a year” unquote
LOL, that fear mongering is rich coming from someone who obviously supports ‘supremacist Maori groups’ (or individuals) who have definitely been working and operating for many a year (since the 70s) to siphon assets and wealth from New Zealanders and gain racist special privileges/rights that are not available to other NZers.
It is true that some New Zealanders are working (mostly voluntarily, not funded as some supremacist Maori are) to create public awareness of the racial division that tribalists such as the race baiting Treaty trougher TUKAKI are inflicting on our great little country. He is disowning his own FTW racist shadow and projecting it onto Caucasian Kiwis who oppose him politically.
TUKAKI says >
“an education system that brings our children to a point where they grow up in a world not knowing their own identity or place to stand”unquote
The education system should be about equipping our young New Zealanders to survive and flourish in today’s competitive, globalist world, not about dwelling in the past and self-victimising by wallowing in a romanticised view of 1700s early village people pre Bronze Age tribalism and the primitivism of life before the invention of the wheel or the ability to boil water on a fire in a ceramic pot.
RACE GRIFTING NASTY ‘AMBUSH’ INTERVIEW - Maniapoto, Tukaki, Costello
Video above analyzed by AR & SW
Just because you’re a minority doesn’t mean you’re oppressed Let’s take a look at some points in this race grifting nasty ‘ambush’ interview An overview note that Maniapoto and Tukaki are scrambling to personalise the debate and define Casey Costello’s identity by slinging dirty, dirty smears
Firstly, we take our hats off to Casey Costello for entering the vipers’ den and participating on a 2 vs. 1 tilted playing field where her opponents hold the cards and dominate the airwaves, constantly interrupting and badgering her with smears and sneers — a very courageous lady.
———————————-
TUKAKI says >
“our people have been suffering for many years” unquote
“our people”? > That’s neo-apartheid racism right there…
as for “suffering” see reply #2 below
TUKAKI says >
“our people have suffered institutional racism from the time we were settled by Europeans” unquote
—Institutional racism—
The basis of ‘evidence’ for the claim of ‘institutional racism’ appears to be a body of work undertaken by the Human Rights Commission in 2010.
They interviewed 35 people, yes, a sample of 35! Were they randomly selected?. They interviewed 35 people to conclude that racism is rampant within New Zealand’s public service institutions. What a confirmation bias skewed rort! That sort of ‘study’ is indistinguishable from a drummed up narrative fraud.
For such a report to have been offered as serious research is an indictment on the Human Rights Commission’s role of propping up anti-British civilisation of New Zealand false narratives and breathing oxygen into race grifting confirmation bias in favour of the narrative fraud the British Empire’s colonisation of New Zealand was a ‘mistake’ that needs to be ‘corrected’ by the NZHRC race hustling white shaming and ‘post colonial white guilt’. This is another example of why this one-eyed agency holds a knife to the heart of race relations in New Zealand, drums-up narratives of white racism where there isn’t any, and should be abolished forthwith.
Needless to say that bogus ‘research’ was seized upon by the identity political Maori Party narcissists, who are desperately looking for any confected justification and opportunity to insert Treaty clauses directly into legislation…
Continue reading here > www.nzcpr.com/institutional-racism/
Further, see Elliot Ikilei’s video on Māori imprisonment and institutional racism here >
sites.google.com/…/kiwifrontl…/enlightenments/racism
TUKAKI says >
“people are being excluded as opposed to being included “ unquote
It is activist Maori identitarians, Treaty Troughers such as Tukaki that reject being a New Zealander, reject being a Kiwi, label themselves ‘Maori’ of this or that Iwi, and therefore exclude themselves. They self-victimise, self-ostracise for the benefits, such as funding and racial special privileges etc. In the longer term though, this identity political strategy is to gain power and wealth by pretending that 92 percent of Maori chiefs in 1840 did not cede sovereignty of New Zealand to the Queen in a protection-for-British-citizenship deal. This strategy is an a-historical effort to claw Maori sovereignty back by breaking the terms of the Treaty. This begins with the lie that The Treaty is a fraud.
TUKAKI says >
“teaching our kids in the classroom about our shared history” unquote
‘Shared history’? — again Trougher Tukaki sees Maori / non-Maori — it is one history, New Zealand history.
TUKAKI says >
“at the moment we get a one-sided view of history” unquote
Correct—the one-sided myth & bad history faux Maori view of New Zealand’s civilisation by the British is being taught right now in our education system.
TUKAKI says >
“if we had of started this process decades and decades ago we wouldn’t be we are today” unquote
We are where we are today because—see > sites.google.com/…/enlightenme…/how-it-all-started-1
MANIAPOTO says >
“51% of maori make up the prison incarceration rate and 380% are more likely to be convicted of a crime… surely those statistics point to some form of institutional racism” unquote
In the main, people in prison or convicted of a crime—have committed a crime, of which there is a victim or victims, regardless of race. The victims of young Maori male violent crime tend to be Maori.
MANIAPOTO says >
“if you look around the world at indigenous Australians, native Canadians and Americans, those people are represented negatively in all statistics similar to maori, so can you see a link between colonisation, ongoing disempowerment and those negative statistics” unquote
There is no valid similar comparison — At that time (1800s) a strong humanitarian movement centred on the churches influenced British colonial policy and this meant the Colonial Secretary Lord Normanby genuinely tried to treat New Zealand inhabitants (Maori) better than happened in earlier colonisations — which led to a race unifying treaty in which Maori were granted the rights of British citizens (arguably the British Empire was the greatest power on earth at that time, there is no doubt they could have crushed Maori militarily if they had wanted to. The British won Anglo-Zulu War that was fought in 1879 between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom, a more formidable enemy).
Being granted British citizenship, and protection in exchange for 92% of chiefs ceding sovereignty was a huge boon to Maori, especially the thousands of slaves to the Maori ruling tribal elite.
TUKAKI says >
“the institutions have not been set up in Maori’s favour” unquote
Since 1840 many statutes have been passed with good intention to help Maori adapt to changing times. But today’s crop of identity political, anti colonial, neo tribal agenda driven grievance mongering Maori and their white Left sycophants twist these to put them in bad light.
TUKAKI says >
“somebody comes to our country and what they then do is implementing their own way of doing things” unquote
In an era of exploration, Maori and New Zealand could not stay isolated, it was inevitable they would be discovered, first by the Dutch, then by the English and French.
After Maori chiefs begged for protection (letter to King William IV 1831) mainly from the French, the British offered them a treaty which the large majority signed. This treaty involved the British way of doing things like—legal title to land, British Common Law etc. It was clear to those wise chiefs that the maori way of doing things was not sufficient any longer.
TUKAKI says >
“we were fine before anybody else got here” unquote
I wonder would Tukaki and his racist malcontent ilk would like to go back and live in pre-European times of tribal pillage and plunder (warfare), feast and famine, in places and at times bitterly cold conditions with unsuitable housing and clothes etc. Tukaki’s portly frame looks like he is doing OK in the current era 🙂
TUKAKI says >
“bringing to bear the percentage of blood we have flowing through our veins” unquote
In 1953 Maori voted to affirm the setting the blood quantum for enrolment on the Maori electoral roll to be set at 50 percent Maori or more, in the mid-seventies when, as a result of the rapid rate of intermarriage in this country, the number of legally defined ‘Maori’ with 50 percent or more of Maori blood, was in serious decline.
This led to demands for a change in the legal definition and, as a result, the 1974 Maori Affairs Amendment Act replaced the blood quantum classification with one based on self-identification and ethnic affiliation—in other words, having a Maori descendent. (Alan Richards adds – or ‘I feel Maori’)
This arbitrary political manoeuvre, is just that, an arbitrary definition based on a consensus of opinion which guaranteed an on-going rise in the number of people categorised as ‘Maori’, thereby fulfilling the tribal leaders’ ambitions for consolidating and increasing power and resources.
Over the years, the Maori rights movement has also successfully persuaded successive governments to allocate increasing levels of funding to race-based initiatives – all in the name of reducing so-called ‘Maori’ disadvantage, rather than reducing disadvantage based on need. The problem is that such programmes are based on a false premise—it is not being Maori that causes disadvantage, instead, it is such culturally influenced things as a lack of education, long term welfare dependency, sole parenthood, relational, family and community cultures of violence and criminality, substance abuse, or living in an area where there are no jobs.
Many New Zealanders are becoming increasingly alarmed about the long-term impact of the government’s continued dangerously divisive promotion of ‘race’ within our society. It is being used by corporate iwi as a ruse to progress their increasingly radical demands... > www.nzcpr.com/reflecting-on-our-past-and-future/
TUKAKI says >
“we have right wing groups that have been working and operating for many a year” unquote
LOL, that fear mongering is rich coming from someone who obviously supports ‘supremacist Maori groups’ (or individuals) who have definitely been working and operating for many a year (since the 70s) to siphon assets and wealth from New Zealanders and gain racist special privileges/rights that are not available to other NZers.
It is true that some New Zealanders are working (mostly voluntarily, not funded as some supremacist Maori are) to create public awareness of the racial division that tribalists such as the race baiting Treaty trougher TUKAKI are inflicting on our great little country. He is disowning his own FTW racist shadow and projecting it onto Caucasian Kiwis who oppose him politically.
TUKAKI says >
“an education system that brings our children to a point where they grow up in a world not knowing their own identity or place to stand”unquote
The education system should be about equipping our young New Zealanders to survive and flourish in today’s competitive, globalist world, not about dwelling in the past and self-victimising by wallowing in a romanticised view of 1700s early village people pre Bronze Age tribalism and the primitivism of life before the invention of the wheel or the ability to boil water on a fire in a ceramic pot.
