Post by Kiwi Frontline on Apr 19, 2020 14:33:16 GMT 12
MATTHEW TUKAKI'S UNHINGED RANT
.
See the video here > www.facebook.com/matthew.tukaki/videos/601879493733392/
Tukaki’s view: Pakeha industry; them vs.us.
Kiwis’ view: It is our NZ industry, inclusive of all ethnicities, which has provided the many benefits that we all enjoy.
Tukaki’s view: Don’t look at the Hobson’s Pledge website.
Kiwis’ view: What’s he afraid of? That we will find out for ourselves that Hobson’s Pledge advocates peace, prosperity and equality for ALL Kiwis, no matter who our ancestors were.
Hobsons Pledge website > www.hobsonspledge.nz/hobson_s_pledge
Tukaki’s view: The Hobson’s Pledge website is full of hate.
Kiwis’ view: Can’t see any hate on that site, only a concern that rights are increasingly being distributed based on some ancestry which is a recipe for resentment and unrest.
History has demonstrated time and time again that peace and prosperity only comes from treating all citizens equally.
Tukaki’s view: Our country is called Aotearoa.
Kiwis’ view: Is our country’s name being changed by stealth? No one has asked us what we think.
European explorers recognised the geographical groupings of islands in the Pacific and give them names. Abel Tasman’s first labelled our country as Staten Landt in 1642. Subsequent confirmation of the island nature of this land mass caused the Dutch to relabel it on maps in 1645 as Nieuw Zeeland. That was subsequently anglicised to New Zealand - our country’s name for the last 370 years.
In the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, our country’s name was transliterated into Maori, so only appears as “Nu Tirani”. Even in official documents a hundred years later, it had been modified only slightly in Maori to the somewhat more accurate rendering of “Niu Tireni”.
Pre-colonisation, there was no united country, no united governance, and no Maori name for the combined islands. So the current use of “Aotearoa” misrepresents the history and origins of New Zealand.
Different tribes had many names for various islands; “Aotearoa” was just one of them. It was the recent inventors of te reo who decided on the use of one name, “Aotearoa”, to fill the gap.
Here in 2020, we are all New Zealanders, whatever our ethnic mix; our country has been New Zealand for 370 years and it should stay that way. We are proud of being New Zealanders and Aotearoa-ians simply doesn’t quite work anyway!
sites.google.com/site/kiwifrontline/enlightenments/aotearoa
Tukaki’s view: “We are not one people; we are a multiplicity (sic) nation”
Kiwis’ view: As he acknowledged each chief after they signed the Treaty (at Waitangi), Lieutenant Hobson stated “he iwi tahi tatou” – "we are now one people". He obviously didn’t mean that we are ethnically or culturally one people; rather he meant that we were united under one sovereign, all with the same rights as British citizens, under one system of law and order.
As evidenced in Hobson’s statement pre-signing, the chiefs had asked for this, i.e. "You yourselves have often asked the King of England to extend his protection unto you. Her Majesty now offers you that protection in this treaty ... But as the law of England gives no civil powers to Her Majesty out of her domain, her efforts to do you good will be futile unless you consent”...... And ‘consent’ they did by signing the Treaty and ceding full sovereignty to the Crown.
Tukaki’s view: Some of our ancestors were here before the others. Those of us who identify as Maori are kaitiake, and hold kaitiakeship over the country.
Kiwis’ view: With inter-tribal warfare out of control, over 500 chiefs signed 'kaitiaki’ away in 1840. Since then, the Crown has held guardianship of our country for the benefit of ALL New Zealanders.
Reference the following chiefs’ speeches before the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi:
* Tamati Pukututu (Te Uri-o-Te-Hawato): “Sit, Governor, sit, for me, for us. Remain here, a father for us.”
* Matiu (Uri-o-Ngongo): “Do not go back, but sit here, a Governor, a father for us.”
* Pumuka (Te Roroa): “I wish to have two fathers – thou (the Governor) and Busby, and the missionaries.”
* Warerahi (Ngaitawake): “Is it not good to be in peace? We will have this man as our Governor” and “Say to this man of the Queen, Go back! No, no.”
* Rawiri (Ngatitautahi): “Stay here, O Governor! … that we may be in peace.”
* Hone Heke (Matarahurahu): “Remain, Governor, a father for us.”
* Tamati Waka Nene (Ngatihao): “[R]emain for us – a father, a judge, a peacemaker. Stay thou, our friend, our father, our Governor.”
* Eruera Maehe Patuone, Tamati Waka Nene’s older brother: “Remain here with us, to be a father for us, that the French have us not.”
Ref: Colenso’s report - www.waitangi.com/colenso/colhis1.html
Tukaki’s view: Those New Zealanders (80%) raising concerns about separatism are haters and racists.
Kiwis’ view: Concerned New Zealanders care about all of us and our future. They want peace, harmony and fairness for all. Meanwhile the separatists (Matthew Tukaki and ilk) who allocate privilege based on selective ancestry are the racists. They aggressively attack the democratic principle that we are all as good as each other.
Tukaki’s view: If you never speak out against radical Maori and the absurdities they promote and have a Maori ancestor (even way back), then we’ll accept you as a bro.
Kiwis’ view: Our bloodlines are so intermingled and we work, live, love and play together, so we are all New Zealanders first and foremost.
In 1953 Maori voted for setting the blood quantum for enrolment on the Maori electoral roll 50% Maori or more. Two decades later, when the rapid rate of intermarriage had reduced the number who qualified, political forces brought in the 1974 Maori Affairs Amendment Act which replaced the blood quantum classification with self-identification and a Maori ancestor (i.e. ‘I feel Maori’).
This arbitrary political manoeuvre guaranteed a continuing rise in ‘Maori’ numbers (no matter how diluted the blood line), thereby fulfilling the tribal leaders’ ambitions for increased political power and resources.
Over the years, the Maori rights movement has increased public funding for race-based initiatives – rather than reducing disadvantage based on need. It is not being Maori that causes disadvantage; it is a lack of education, long term welfare dependency, sole parenthood, family and community violence and criminality, substance abuse, or living away from work opportunities.
The long-term impact of the government’s dangerously divisive policies is increasing radicalisation and anti-pakeha rhetoric.....
www.nzcpr.com/reflecting-on-our-past-and-future/
Tukaki’s view: This country belongs to us.
Kiwis’ view: It’s 2020. We must look to the future and build a peaceful and prosperous country for all us, no matter who our ancestors were.
Tukaki’s view: Maori are showing up in all negative statistics.
Kiwis’ view: People who identify as ‘Maori’ are over represented in the worst social statistics, but it’s not the colour of their skin that has caused this.
The causes are welfare dependency, drug and alcohol abuse, family breakdown, and educational failure. This means Maori make up a disproportionate share of the young uneducated and unemployed who are more likely to commit crime.
The claim of ‘institutional racism’ was made by the Human Rights Commission in 2010 after interviewed a mere 35 people. This lack of professionalism and credibility is another example of why this biased agency should be abolished. They are a tool of radical separatists.......
www.nzcpr.com/institutional-racism/
Tukaki’s view: I will lodge complaints against Hobson’s Pledge with the Human Rights Commission and police.
Kiwis’ view: Ok, why doesn’t he then? If Hobson's Pledge and the other anti-discrimination groups are lying, why is Tukaki so desperately trying to silence them?
Tukaki’s view: We self-identifying Maori want Government to give us more than you. We self-appointed leaders are the elite who deserve immense privilege and adulation.
Kiwis’ view: Democracy delivers greater peace and prosperity than any other system of government because its basic premise is no discrimination. Every individual has the same rights and responsibilities under the law.
We can enjoy different cultural, religious, social or sporting interests, but they don’t give us any preferential status over others. Democracy is based on equal rights to all. Special rights or privileges to anyone or any group will only end in growing resentment.
It appears Mr Tukaki and his ilk want to destroy all that is good about New Zealand for their own personal gain.
.
See the video here > www.facebook.com/matthew.tukaki/videos/601879493733392/
Tukaki’s view: Pakeha industry; them vs.us.
Kiwis’ view: It is our NZ industry, inclusive of all ethnicities, which has provided the many benefits that we all enjoy.
Tukaki’s view: Don’t look at the Hobson’s Pledge website.
Kiwis’ view: What’s he afraid of? That we will find out for ourselves that Hobson’s Pledge advocates peace, prosperity and equality for ALL Kiwis, no matter who our ancestors were.
Hobsons Pledge website > www.hobsonspledge.nz/hobson_s_pledge
Tukaki’s view: The Hobson’s Pledge website is full of hate.
Kiwis’ view: Can’t see any hate on that site, only a concern that rights are increasingly being distributed based on some ancestry which is a recipe for resentment and unrest.
History has demonstrated time and time again that peace and prosperity only comes from treating all citizens equally.
Tukaki’s view: Our country is called Aotearoa.
Kiwis’ view: Is our country’s name being changed by stealth? No one has asked us what we think.
European explorers recognised the geographical groupings of islands in the Pacific and give them names. Abel Tasman’s first labelled our country as Staten Landt in 1642. Subsequent confirmation of the island nature of this land mass caused the Dutch to relabel it on maps in 1645 as Nieuw Zeeland. That was subsequently anglicised to New Zealand - our country’s name for the last 370 years.
In the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, our country’s name was transliterated into Maori, so only appears as “Nu Tirani”. Even in official documents a hundred years later, it had been modified only slightly in Maori to the somewhat more accurate rendering of “Niu Tireni”.
Pre-colonisation, there was no united country, no united governance, and no Maori name for the combined islands. So the current use of “Aotearoa” misrepresents the history and origins of New Zealand.
Different tribes had many names for various islands; “Aotearoa” was just one of them. It was the recent inventors of te reo who decided on the use of one name, “Aotearoa”, to fill the gap.
Here in 2020, we are all New Zealanders, whatever our ethnic mix; our country has been New Zealand for 370 years and it should stay that way. We are proud of being New Zealanders and Aotearoa-ians simply doesn’t quite work anyway!
sites.google.com/site/kiwifrontline/enlightenments/aotearoa
Tukaki’s view: “We are not one people; we are a multiplicity (sic) nation”
Kiwis’ view: As he acknowledged each chief after they signed the Treaty (at Waitangi), Lieutenant Hobson stated “he iwi tahi tatou” – "we are now one people". He obviously didn’t mean that we are ethnically or culturally one people; rather he meant that we were united under one sovereign, all with the same rights as British citizens, under one system of law and order.
As evidenced in Hobson’s statement pre-signing, the chiefs had asked for this, i.e. "You yourselves have often asked the King of England to extend his protection unto you. Her Majesty now offers you that protection in this treaty ... But as the law of England gives no civil powers to Her Majesty out of her domain, her efforts to do you good will be futile unless you consent”...... And ‘consent’ they did by signing the Treaty and ceding full sovereignty to the Crown.
Tukaki’s view: Some of our ancestors were here before the others. Those of us who identify as Maori are kaitiake, and hold kaitiakeship over the country.
Kiwis’ view: With inter-tribal warfare out of control, over 500 chiefs signed 'kaitiaki’ away in 1840. Since then, the Crown has held guardianship of our country for the benefit of ALL New Zealanders.
Reference the following chiefs’ speeches before the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi:
* Tamati Pukututu (Te Uri-o-Te-Hawato): “Sit, Governor, sit, for me, for us. Remain here, a father for us.”
* Matiu (Uri-o-Ngongo): “Do not go back, but sit here, a Governor, a father for us.”
* Pumuka (Te Roroa): “I wish to have two fathers – thou (the Governor) and Busby, and the missionaries.”
* Warerahi (Ngaitawake): “Is it not good to be in peace? We will have this man as our Governor” and “Say to this man of the Queen, Go back! No, no.”
* Rawiri (Ngatitautahi): “Stay here, O Governor! … that we may be in peace.”
* Hone Heke (Matarahurahu): “Remain, Governor, a father for us.”
* Tamati Waka Nene (Ngatihao): “[R]emain for us – a father, a judge, a peacemaker. Stay thou, our friend, our father, our Governor.”
* Eruera Maehe Patuone, Tamati Waka Nene’s older brother: “Remain here with us, to be a father for us, that the French have us not.”
Ref: Colenso’s report - www.waitangi.com/colenso/colhis1.html
Tukaki’s view: Those New Zealanders (80%) raising concerns about separatism are haters and racists.
Kiwis’ view: Concerned New Zealanders care about all of us and our future. They want peace, harmony and fairness for all. Meanwhile the separatists (Matthew Tukaki and ilk) who allocate privilege based on selective ancestry are the racists. They aggressively attack the democratic principle that we are all as good as each other.
Tukaki’s view: If you never speak out against radical Maori and the absurdities they promote and have a Maori ancestor (even way back), then we’ll accept you as a bro.
Kiwis’ view: Our bloodlines are so intermingled and we work, live, love and play together, so we are all New Zealanders first and foremost.
In 1953 Maori voted for setting the blood quantum for enrolment on the Maori electoral roll 50% Maori or more. Two decades later, when the rapid rate of intermarriage had reduced the number who qualified, political forces brought in the 1974 Maori Affairs Amendment Act which replaced the blood quantum classification with self-identification and a Maori ancestor (i.e. ‘I feel Maori’).
This arbitrary political manoeuvre guaranteed a continuing rise in ‘Maori’ numbers (no matter how diluted the blood line), thereby fulfilling the tribal leaders’ ambitions for increased political power and resources.
Over the years, the Maori rights movement has increased public funding for race-based initiatives – rather than reducing disadvantage based on need. It is not being Maori that causes disadvantage; it is a lack of education, long term welfare dependency, sole parenthood, family and community violence and criminality, substance abuse, or living away from work opportunities.
The long-term impact of the government’s dangerously divisive policies is increasing radicalisation and anti-pakeha rhetoric.....
www.nzcpr.com/reflecting-on-our-past-and-future/
Tukaki’s view: This country belongs to us.
Kiwis’ view: It’s 2020. We must look to the future and build a peaceful and prosperous country for all us, no matter who our ancestors were.
Tukaki’s view: Maori are showing up in all negative statistics.
Kiwis’ view: People who identify as ‘Maori’ are over represented in the worst social statistics, but it’s not the colour of their skin that has caused this.
The causes are welfare dependency, drug and alcohol abuse, family breakdown, and educational failure. This means Maori make up a disproportionate share of the young uneducated and unemployed who are more likely to commit crime.
The claim of ‘institutional racism’ was made by the Human Rights Commission in 2010 after interviewed a mere 35 people. This lack of professionalism and credibility is another example of why this biased agency should be abolished. They are a tool of radical separatists.......
www.nzcpr.com/institutional-racism/
Tukaki’s view: I will lodge complaints against Hobson’s Pledge with the Human Rights Commission and police.
Kiwis’ view: Ok, why doesn’t he then? If Hobson's Pledge and the other anti-discrimination groups are lying, why is Tukaki so desperately trying to silence them?
Tukaki’s view: We self-identifying Maori want Government to give us more than you. We self-appointed leaders are the elite who deserve immense privilege and adulation.
Kiwis’ view: Democracy delivers greater peace and prosperity than any other system of government because its basic premise is no discrimination. Every individual has the same rights and responsibilities under the law.
We can enjoy different cultural, religious, social or sporting interests, but they don’t give us any preferential status over others. Democracy is based on equal rights to all. Special rights or privileges to anyone or any group will only end in growing resentment.
It appears Mr Tukaki and his ilk want to destroy all that is good about New Zealand for their own personal gain.