Post by Kiwi Frontline on Jun 26, 2023 12:24:58 GMT 12
Winston Peters Otago speech 25/6/23
THE RISE OF RACIST POLICIES THAT YOU WERE NEVER WARNED ABOUT
In the last four years members of the Labour government have been secretly working on socially re-engineering our whole society. They justify this as arising from commitments to the United Nations that National and John Key made.
A previous Labour Prime Minister, Helen Clark, agreed with me back in 2007, that we would not sign up to a UN declaration that subverted the sovereignty of our law. Yet three years later, John Key signed up for that, gave an unelected Māori voice to the Auckland Super City, then abolished New Zealand First’s Foreshore and Seabed legislation in favour of their Marine and Coastal Areas Act - which now sees over six hundred claims for New Zealand’s foreshore and seabed. And the taxpayer is contributing up to $300,000 for each claim.
Ladies and gentlemen, the mass majority of Māori have never made such a demand.
These changes are a result of the Māori wing of the Labour Party being in a race to bottom with the Māori Party.
The mass majority of Māori are by Labour’s own definition, on the general roll with the rest of us. Despite spending millions of dollars in the latest enrollment process, ordinary Māori have voted with their feet, and want to be part of a single franchise with the 95% of remaining New Zealanders.
CO-GOVERNMENT, HOW DID WE GET IT?
This week in parliament, the Three Waters, now Ten Waters, legislation had its first reading. What was alarming to those who watched the parliamentary debate, was the lack of understanding of what is being prospected here, and the lack of concern and passion being shown in defense of over 95% of this country’s population.
All aspects of water will now be controlled by ten bodies, fifty percent of whom must be local unelected Māori, but requiring a 75% decision proviso, which means local unelected Māori can veto any and every proposal.
Chris Hipkins said it is ‘not co-governance and never has been’. The Minister in charge Kieran McAnulty says it is, defended it, and said ‘Māori have a special interest in water’ - and so the rest of us don’t?
So here in the South Island where so many Māori and not Ngai Tahu, they nevertheless will be lumped in with the rest of the population and lose ownership of water utilities which you and your ancestors all built and paid for. If you are a Labour, Green, or Māori Party voter tell us how can this possibly be fair?
These secret policies were prepared by Labour in secret. There is no historic justification for them, which is why they have set out to re-write and reconstruct history.
To get to where these politicians are taking us, they deal in shibboleths and lies, including these four claims:
* That the arrival of Europeans ruined the peaceful paradise of Māori,
* That the Treaty of Waitangi saw Māori begin a partnership with Queen Victoria,
* That the Treaty of Waitangi was not about Māori ceding sovereignty,
* That the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840 meant Māori ‘self-government’
Stop for a moment and ask yourself, whether you’re Māori or non-Māori, can any of those four statements be remotely true?
It puts one in mind of the malignant statement – “if you’re going to tell a lie, make sure it’s a big one, because its more likely to be believed.”
- Every Iwi history of the inter-tribal wars makes the ‘Māori Garden of Eden’ a complete myth.
- If no one in Britain or the UK or the whole British Empire was in a partnership with the Crown on the 5th of February 1840, then how could it be constitutionally true that Māori were, two days later?
- The fact is Māori ceded sovereignty to the Crown when they signed the Treaty. The Chiefs back then said so, as did many leading Māori later, including Sir Apirana Ngata, Sir Maui Pomare, and Sir Peter Buck. Only todays elite power-hungry Māori and their cultural fellow travelers seek to deny history and facts and arrogantly argue otherwise.
- All Māori Iwi pre-1840 and well after, were under the control of their ‘Tino Rangatiratanga’. That means their Chief’s word was gospel. If there was back then co-government, which Chief’s word, if different, was gospel?
- The elite’s argument does not stand up to the slightest scrutiny. Under their own description of ‘co-government’ pre 1840 then Māori were constantly at war.
And every honest Māori knows it. And there’s the rub…..
www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2306/S00161/past-performance-not-future-promises.htm
THE RISE OF RACIST POLICIES THAT YOU WERE NEVER WARNED ABOUT
In the last four years members of the Labour government have been secretly working on socially re-engineering our whole society. They justify this as arising from commitments to the United Nations that National and John Key made.
A previous Labour Prime Minister, Helen Clark, agreed with me back in 2007, that we would not sign up to a UN declaration that subverted the sovereignty of our law. Yet three years later, John Key signed up for that, gave an unelected Māori voice to the Auckland Super City, then abolished New Zealand First’s Foreshore and Seabed legislation in favour of their Marine and Coastal Areas Act - which now sees over six hundred claims for New Zealand’s foreshore and seabed. And the taxpayer is contributing up to $300,000 for each claim.
Ladies and gentlemen, the mass majority of Māori have never made such a demand.
These changes are a result of the Māori wing of the Labour Party being in a race to bottom with the Māori Party.
The mass majority of Māori are by Labour’s own definition, on the general roll with the rest of us. Despite spending millions of dollars in the latest enrollment process, ordinary Māori have voted with their feet, and want to be part of a single franchise with the 95% of remaining New Zealanders.
CO-GOVERNMENT, HOW DID WE GET IT?
This week in parliament, the Three Waters, now Ten Waters, legislation had its first reading. What was alarming to those who watched the parliamentary debate, was the lack of understanding of what is being prospected here, and the lack of concern and passion being shown in defense of over 95% of this country’s population.
All aspects of water will now be controlled by ten bodies, fifty percent of whom must be local unelected Māori, but requiring a 75% decision proviso, which means local unelected Māori can veto any and every proposal.
Chris Hipkins said it is ‘not co-governance and never has been’. The Minister in charge Kieran McAnulty says it is, defended it, and said ‘Māori have a special interest in water’ - and so the rest of us don’t?
So here in the South Island where so many Māori and not Ngai Tahu, they nevertheless will be lumped in with the rest of the population and lose ownership of water utilities which you and your ancestors all built and paid for. If you are a Labour, Green, or Māori Party voter tell us how can this possibly be fair?
These secret policies were prepared by Labour in secret. There is no historic justification for them, which is why they have set out to re-write and reconstruct history.
To get to where these politicians are taking us, they deal in shibboleths and lies, including these four claims:
* That the arrival of Europeans ruined the peaceful paradise of Māori,
* That the Treaty of Waitangi saw Māori begin a partnership with Queen Victoria,
* That the Treaty of Waitangi was not about Māori ceding sovereignty,
* That the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840 meant Māori ‘self-government’
Stop for a moment and ask yourself, whether you’re Māori or non-Māori, can any of those four statements be remotely true?
It puts one in mind of the malignant statement – “if you’re going to tell a lie, make sure it’s a big one, because its more likely to be believed.”
- Every Iwi history of the inter-tribal wars makes the ‘Māori Garden of Eden’ a complete myth.
- If no one in Britain or the UK or the whole British Empire was in a partnership with the Crown on the 5th of February 1840, then how could it be constitutionally true that Māori were, two days later?
- The fact is Māori ceded sovereignty to the Crown when they signed the Treaty. The Chiefs back then said so, as did many leading Māori later, including Sir Apirana Ngata, Sir Maui Pomare, and Sir Peter Buck. Only todays elite power-hungry Māori and their cultural fellow travelers seek to deny history and facts and arrogantly argue otherwise.
- All Māori Iwi pre-1840 and well after, were under the control of their ‘Tino Rangatiratanga’. That means their Chief’s word was gospel. If there was back then co-government, which Chief’s word, if different, was gospel?
- The elite’s argument does not stand up to the slightest scrutiny. Under their own description of ‘co-government’ pre 1840 then Māori were constantly at war.
And every honest Māori knows it. And there’s the rub…..
www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2306/S00161/past-performance-not-future-promises.htm