Post by Kiwi Frontline on Jun 29, 2023 11:21:59 GMT 12
John Robinson: ANOTHER STEP TOWARDS MAORI GOVERNMENT
New Zealand is to move away from modern civilisation to a stone-age tribal form of government, from a unified nation where we are one people, to the balkanisation of fragmented sovereignty.
Many steps have been taken in that direction, as support for the breakup of the nation has come from many groups and organisations, including government and the justice system. Here are a few examples.
The Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011, sets down a radically different new test for customary marine title, taking account of “the intrinsic, inherited rights of iwi, hapu, and whanau, derived in accordance with tikanga”.[4]
The courts have played their part, introducing an undefined tikanga into law, with the meaning to be determined by the hapu concerned.[5]
“The Waitangi Tribunal has advanced ideas of dual sovereignty, so that hapu and iwi can exert their own separate sovereignty, and has falsely ruled that many Maori never accepted the sovereignty of the government.”[6]
And, of course, there is the revision (rewriting, even falsification) of history and the reversal of the Treaty of Waitangi, from the call that “Now we are one people” to the very opposite, a divided ‘partnership’, and from a united sovereignty to divided sovereignty held by the many hapu.....
breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/2023/06/john-robinson-another-step-towards.html
New Zealand is to move away from modern civilisation to a stone-age tribal form of government, from a unified nation where we are one people, to the balkanisation of fragmented sovereignty.
Many steps have been taken in that direction, as support for the breakup of the nation has come from many groups and organisations, including government and the justice system. Here are a few examples.
The Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011, sets down a radically different new test for customary marine title, taking account of “the intrinsic, inherited rights of iwi, hapu, and whanau, derived in accordance with tikanga”.[4]
The courts have played their part, introducing an undefined tikanga into law, with the meaning to be determined by the hapu concerned.[5]
“The Waitangi Tribunal has advanced ideas of dual sovereignty, so that hapu and iwi can exert their own separate sovereignty, and has falsely ruled that many Maori never accepted the sovereignty of the government.”[6]
And, of course, there is the revision (rewriting, even falsification) of history and the reversal of the Treaty of Waitangi, from the call that “Now we are one people” to the very opposite, a divided ‘partnership’, and from a united sovereignty to divided sovereignty held by the many hapu.....
breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/2023/06/john-robinson-another-step-towards.html